Claiming Yourself va Using a CMC
There are two routes to making an unaffordable lending complaint: do it yourself, or use a regulated claims management company (CMC). Both are legitimate. Both can succeed. The right choice depends on the case, your time, your confidence with paperwork, and what you would rather pay — your time or a percentage of the recovery. This page compares the two routes head-to-head on the points that matter.
Check your agreements on Recoup, our claim partner’s site
Cost
Direct: free. The complaint to the lender is free, the referral to FOS is free, the time you spend is your own.
CMC: a success fee, capped by the FCA. The fee is a percentage of the redress recovered, paid only if the claim succeeds. For most cases the cap is £420 (small claims) or £600 (mid-sized claims), with stepped caps up to a £24,000 maximum on the largest cases. There should never be an upfront fee or a fee for unsuccessful claims.
Time
Direct: substantial. A typical claim involves a SAR (preparation, sending, follow-up if needed), gathering bank statements, obtaining a credit report, drafting the complaint, managing the lender correspondence, and — if needed — handling the FOS referral. Across the full timeline of weeks to months, expect to spend several hours of focused work.
CMC: minimal. The CMC handles the SAR, evidence, drafting, lender correspondence and FOS escalation. Your time is largely limited to the initial onboarding and reviewing offers when they come in.
Complexity handling
Direct: works well for simple cases — a single loan, clear facts, a single lender. Becomes harder where there are multiple loans in a sequence, multiple credit limit increases, several lenders to claim against, or where the lender disputes the case at FOS and detailed submissions are needed.
CMC: better fit for complex cases. The CMC has the experience to identify which loans in a sequence to claim against, how to frame credit limit increases as separate events, and how to draft FOS submissions effectively.
Success rate
There is no public data showing materially different success rates between direct complaints and CMC-handled complaints at the Financial Ombudsman. FOS applies the same fair and reasonable test regardless of representation. A well-evidenced direct complaint can succeed every bit as well as a CMC-handled one. Equally, a thinly-evidenced direct complaint may fail where a properly-prepared CMC complaint would have succeeded.
The practical advantage CMCs bring is consistency of preparation — they know what evidence to gather and how to present it. The advantage direct claimants have is being closer to the facts and their own life context.
Lender response patterns
Lenders treat all complaints equally on the regulatory framework, but in practice CMC-submitted complaints sometimes get quicker engagement because they tend to arrive in a familiar format with the evidence already curated. Direct complaints can sometimes go through more back-and-forth where the lender asks for additional information that the CMC would have provided up-front.
Confidence and stress
For some people, the confidence factor matters most. Drafting a complaint, dealing with a lender pushing back, handling a rejection, then drafting a FOS submission can be tiring and stressful — particularly for people who are still in financial difficulty or who have anxiety about the original lending. CMCs absorb that emotional load. They take the calls, manage the back-and-forth, and tell you what to do.
Vulnerability
If you are vulnerable for any reason — health, mental health, dealing with a bereavement, fragile financial position — both lenders and FOS are obliged to take that into account, regardless of whether you have representation. A CMC can help by taking on the practical work, but FOS itself has dedicated processes for vulnerable consumers and accepts complaints in any format that is workable.
Common pitfalls of doing it yourself
The mistakes people most often make handling complaints themselves:
- Not making a SAR — relying on memory rather than the lender’s actual records.
- Submitting the complaint without bank statements or credit-file evidence to back the affordability point.
- Accepting a partial offer in full and final settlement without understanding what they are giving up.
- Missing the six-month deadline to refer to FOS after a final response.
- Stopping payments while the complaint is open, leading to fresh defaults that the complaint may not reverse.
- Treating the lender’s rejection as final, when most rejections are worth taking to FOS.
Common pitfalls when choosing a CMC
The mistakes people most often make choosing a CMC:
- Not checking the FCA Register before signing — anyone offering claims management for consumer credit must be FCA-authorised.
- Signing up for a high-pressure cold-call without comparing options.
- Paying any upfront fee — this is not how legitimate CMCs work for consumer credit.
- Not reading the cancellation rights — there is a 14-day cooling-off period.
- Assuming the percentage fee is the FCA-capped fee — it should be, but check.
- Using a CMC that asks for online banking credentials — your statements should be obtained by SAR or download, not by handing over login details.
A practical decision framework
In most cases, the decision comes down to:
- Single, simple, recent loan with clear facts and you’re comfortable writing letters — direct is usually fine.
- Multiple loans, credit limit increases, multiple lenders, or you don’t want to manage it — a CMC is usually worth the success fee.
- Already had a complaint rejected and need to escalate to FOS — either route works, but CMCs are practiced at FOS submissions.
- Vulnerable, stressed, or struggling to engage with paperwork — a CMC removes the burden, and free advice from Citizens Advice or a debt charity can help with the wider context.
Related guides
- Do I need a claims company?
- How a claim works step by step
- How the Financial Ombudsman handles unaffordable lending complaints
- What evidence do I need?
- Do I have an unaffordable lending claim?
Check If You Could Be Owed Compensation
You may be eligible to complain if a lender gave you credit you couldn’t afford. Start a free check in minutes — no paperwork needed. No win, no fee if you choose to proceed.
